| W | L | Div% | WC% | Proj W | |
| Baltimore | 32 | 40 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 75.2 |
| Boston | 44 | 28 | 63.0 | 24.8 | 97.4 |
| New York (A) | 40 | 32 | 25.0 | 39.2 | 93.5 |
| Tampa Bay | 39 | 35 | 11.1 | 27.9 | 89.9 |
| Toronto | 40 | 34 | 1.0 | 4.6 | 84.2 |
| Chicago (A) | 35 | 37 | 4.5 | 0.1 | 76.2 |
| Cleveland | 30 | 44 | 6.9 | 0.2 | 75.2 |
| Detroit | 41 | 31 | 65.5 | 0.4 | 86.0 |
| Kansas City | 31 | 40 | 2.0 | 0.1 | 73.3 |
| Minnesota | 37 | 37 | 21.1 | 0.5 | 79.9 |
| Los Angeles (A) | 38 | 32 | 62.3 | 0.6 | 85.7 |
| Oakland | 31 | 40 | 5.6 | 0.2 | 75.8 |
| Seattle | 37 | 35 | 17.1 | 0.7 | 80.6 |
| Texas | 39 | 32 | 15.0 | 0.5 | 80.1 |
| W | L | Div% | WC% | Proj W | |
| Atlanta | 34 | 38 | 11.6 | 5.3 | 81.3 |
| Florida | 38 | 36 | 5.4 | 2.6 | 78.8 |
| New York (N) | 37 | 34 | 46.8 | 11.5 | 87.4 |
| Philadelphia | 37 | 33 | 36.2 | 11.3 | 85.5 |
| Washington | 21 | 49 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 63.2 |
| Chicago (N) | 34 | 35 | 32.2 | 11.4 | 84.2 |
| Cincinnati | 35 | 36 | 5.0 | 3.1 | 77.4 |
| Houston | 33 | 37 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 73.1 |
| Milwaukee | 38 | 34 | 20.4 | 8.3 | 82.7 |
| Pittsburgh | 33 | 39 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 71.5 |
| St. Louis | 40 | 34 | 41.1 | 10.6 | 85.0 |
| Arizona | 30 | 43 | 0.4 | 1.7 | 74.9 |
| Colorado | 37 | 35 | 2.5 | 10.4 | 80.3 |
| Los Angeles (N) | 47 | 26 | 92.3 | 4.1 | 95.7 |
| San Diego | 31 | 40 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 72.0 |
| San Francisco | 39 | 32 | 4.7 | 18.1 | 82.4 |
Friday, June 26, 2009
June 26 MLB Odds
Thursday, April 9, 2009
April 9 MLB Odds
Due to some Excel issues, these numbers aren't totally consistent with yesterday's.
| W | L | Div% | WC% | Proj W | |
| Baltimore | 2 | 0 | 1.1 | 3.3 | 76.5 |
| Boston | 1 | 1 | 38.2 | 28.6 | 94.8 |
| New York (A) | 0 | 2 | 38.8 | 27.7 | 95.0 |
| Tampa Bay | 1 | 1 | 20.6 | 25.3 | 90.8 |
| Toronto | 2 | 1 | 1.2 | 3.2 | 76.4 |
| Chicago (A) | 1 | 1 | 6.7 | 0.5 | 73.6 |
| Cleveland | 0 | 2 | 39.5 | 2.1 | 84.5 |
| Detroit | 1 | 2 | 28.4 | 1.8 | 82.3 |
| Kansas City | 1 | 1 | 9.1 | 0.8 | 75.5 |
| Minnesota | 2 | 1 | 16.2 | 1.2 | 78.7 |
| Los Angeles (A) | 1 | 2 | 42.4 | 1.8 | 84.2 |
| Oakland | 2 | 1 | 32.2 | 2.0 | 82.3 |
| Seattle | 1 | 2 | 19.1 | 1.2 | 78.7 |
| Texas | 2 | 0 | 6.2 | 0.4 | 72.4 |
| W | L | Div% | WC% | Proj W | |
| Atlanta | 2 | 1 | 29.3 | 13.4 | 86.9 |
| Florida | 3 | 0 | 2.6 | 1.9 | 73.7 |
| New York (N) | 2 | 0 | 43.5 | 13.4 | 89.8 |
| Philadelphia | 1 | 2 | 23.0 | 12.2 | 85.4 |
| Washington | 0 | 3 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 71.7 |
| Chicago (N) | 2 | 1 | 61.0 | 9.6 | 92.3 |
| Cincinnati | 0 | 2 | 5.7 | 4.0 | 77.2 |
| Houston | 1 | 2 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 71.0 |
| Milwaukee | 1 | 1 | 16.2 | 10.6 | 83.0 |
| Pittsburgh | 2 | 1 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 69.1 |
| St. Louis | 1 | 2 | 15.3 | 9.7 | 82.8 |
| Arizona | 1 | 2 | 26.4 | 7.0 | 83.8 |
| Colorado | 2 | 1 | 8.0 | 2.7 | 77.0 |
| Los Angeles (N) | 2 | 1 | 50.4 | 6.8 | 88.4 |
| San Diego | 1 | 2 | 4.3 | 1.6 | 73.7 |
| San Francisco | 1 | 1 | 10.9 | 3.9 | 78.5 |
Wednesday, April 8, 2009
April 8 MLB Odds
| W | L | Div% | WC% | Proj W | |
| Baltimore | 1 | 0 | 1.1 | 2.9 | 75.5 |
| Boston | 1 | 0 | 39.1 | 28.4 | 95.0 |
| New York (A) | 0 | 1 | 40.5 | 29.1 | 96.2 |
| Tampa Bay | 0 | 1 | 18.2 | 24.9 | 90.9 |
| Toronto | 2 | 0 | 1.2 | 3.4 | 76.2 |
| Chicago (A) | 1 | 0 | 7.6 | 0.5 | 73.5 |
| Cleveland | 0 | 1 | 43.1 | 1.8 | 85.5 |
| Detroit | 0 | 2 | 26.4 | 1.9 | 82.5 |
| Kansas City | 0 | 1 | 8.9 | 0.8 | 75.4 |
| Minnesota | 1 | 1 | 14.0 | 1.1 | 77.9 |
| Los Angeles (A) | 1 | 1 | 43.6 | 2.0 | 84.6 |
| Oakland | 1 | 1 | 29.8 | 1.7 | 81.7 |
| Seattle | 1 | 1 | 20.8 | 1.1 | 79.0 |
| Texas | 1 | 0 | 5.7 | 0.3 | 71.3 |
| W | L | Div% | WC% | Proj W | |
| Atlanta | 2 | 0 | 31.7 | 13.9 | 85.6 |
| Florida | 2 | 0 | 2.4 | 1.8 | 71.6 |
| New York (N) | 1 | 0 | 42.2 | 13.3 | 88.1 |
| Philadelphia | 0 | 2 | 21.7 | 12.2 | 85.4 |
| Washington | 0 | 2 | 1.9 | 1.3 | 72.7 |
| Chicago (N) | 1 | 1 | 58.2 | 10.1 | 90.7 |
| Cincinnati | 0 | 1 | 6.8 | 4.3 | 77.2 |
| Houston | 1 | 1 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 70.4 |
| Milwaukee | 0 | 1 | 15.3 | 8.8 | 81.7 |
| Pittsburgh | 1 | 1 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 67.1 |
| St. Louis | 1 | 1 | 17.2 | 10.0 | 82.3 |
| Arizona | 1 | 1 | 28.7 | 7.5 | 83.6 |
| Colorado | 1 | 1 | 8.1 | 2.5 | 75.3 |
| Los Angeles (N) | 1 | 1 | 46.2 | 7.2 | 86.9 |
| San Diego | 1 | 1 | 4.5 | 1.5 | 73.1 |
| San Francisco | 1 | 0 | 12.6 | 3.8 | 77.6 |
Tuesday, April 7, 2009
April 7 MLB Odds
| W | L | Div% | WC% | Proj W | |
| Baltimore | 1 | 0 | 1.0 | 2.6 | 75.5 |
| Boston | 0 | 0 | 38.2 | 28.5 | 95.0 |
| New York (A) | 0 | 1 | 40.2 | 28.4 | 96.2 |
| Tampa Bay | 0 | 0 | 19.6 | 25.2 | 90.9 |
| Toronto | 1 | 0 | 1.1 | 3.3 | 76.2 |
| Chicago (A) | 0 | 0 | 6.6 | 0.6 | 73.5 |
| Cleveland | 0 | 1 | 43.5 | 1.9 | 85.5 |
| Detroit | 0 | 1 | 27.3 | 1.9 | 82.5 |
| Kansas City | 0 | 0 | 9.2 | 0.8 | 75.4 |
| Minnesota | 0 | 1 | 13.5 | 1.0 | 77.9 |
| Los Angeles (A) | 1 | 0 | 46.0 | 2.2 | 84.6 |
| Oakland | 0 | 1 | 28.0 | 1.8 | 81.7 |
| Seattle | 1 | 0 | 20.9 | 1.3 | 79.0 |
| Texas | 1 | 0 | 5.0 | 0.4 | 71.3 |
| W | L | Div% | WC% | Proj W | |
| Atlanta | 1 | 0 | 29.2 | 12.9 | 85.6 |
| Florida | 1 | 0 | 2.3 | 1.3 | 71.6 |
| New York (N) | 1 | 0 | 42.0 | 12.3 | 88.1 |
| Philadelphia | 0 | 1 | 24.4 | 11.5 | 85.4 |
| Washington | 0 | 1 | 2.2 | 1.5 | 72.7 |
| Chicago (N) | 1 | 0 | 61.0 | 9.5 | 90.7 |
| Cincinnati | 0 | 1 | 5.7 | 4.6 | 77.2 |
| Houston | 0 | 1 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 70.4 |
| Milwaukee | 0 | 0 | 15.9 | 9.8 | 81.7 |
| Pittsburgh | 1 | 0 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 67.1 |
| St. Louis | 0 | 1 | 15.5 | 10.2 | 82.3 |
| Arizona | 1 | 0 | 30.6 | 8.1 | 83.6 |
| Colorado | 0 | 1 | 6.3 | 2.6 | 75.3 |
| Los Angeles (N) | 1 | 0 | 48.5 | 8.0 | 86.9 |
| San Diego | 0 | 1 | 3.7 | 1.8 | 73.1 |
| San Francisco | 0 | 0 | 10.9 | 4.4 | 77.6 |
Tuesday, March 31, 2009
The 2009 Season, Simulated (CHONE)
(Read the intro to this series.)
This post comes a little late, but work is busy this time of year. On the plus side, while you were all waiting with baited breath, ReplacementLevel.com released this year's Diamond Mind projections. The standard deviation for each team? You guessed it, about six games.
Since the goal is to compare playoff odds against the ideal model, I'm going to brazenly steal the RS/RA outputs from the ReplacementLevel.com CHONE projections. Here's what we come up with in 10,000 simulations for each:
First run: With normal levels of uncertainty. This is as accurate as we can get in the real world:

Second run: "Ideal" projections:
This post comes a little late, but work is busy this time of year. On the plus side, while you were all waiting with baited breath, ReplacementLevel.com released this year's Diamond Mind projections. The standard deviation for each team? You guessed it, about six games.
Since the goal is to compare playoff odds against the ideal model, I'm going to brazenly steal the RS/RA outputs from the ReplacementLevel.com CHONE projections. Here's what we come up with in 10,000 simulations for each:
First run: With normal levels of uncertainty. This is as accurate as we can get in the real world:

Second run: "Ideal" projections:
Thursday, March 19, 2009
The 2009 Season, Simulated (Hardball Times)
(Read the intro to this series.)
Inputs: Runs scored and allowed taken from here, then adjusted for each team's strength of schedule.
Methods: xlsSports playoff simulator. The standard deviation for each team's winning percentage is set to .035 for the first simulation, and zero for the second. 10,000 seasons were simulated for each run.
First run: With normal levels of uncertainty. This is as accurate as we can get in the real world:
Second run: "Ideal" projections:

Of note: since we ran 10,000 projections instead of 100, the A's pull ahead of the Angels with their better run differential, the gap between the Yankees and Red Sox narrows considerably, and the Braves now win the division more often than the Phillies, as they should.
Inputs: Runs scored and allowed taken from here, then adjusted for each team's strength of schedule.
Methods: xlsSports playoff simulator. The standard deviation for each team's winning percentage is set to .035 for the first simulation, and zero for the second. 10,000 seasons were simulated for each run.
First run: With normal levels of uncertainty. This is as accurate as we can get in the real world:
Second run: "Ideal" projections:
Of note: since we ran 10,000 projections instead of 100, the A's pull ahead of the Angels with their better run differential, the gap between the Yankees and Red Sox narrows considerably, and the Braves now win the division more often than the Phillies, as they should.
Wednesday, March 18, 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
